↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for the reduction of prescribed opioid use in chronic non‐cancer pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
71 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
420 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for the reduction of prescribed opioid use in chronic non‐cancer pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010323.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher Eccleston, Emma Fisher, Kyla H Thomas, Leslie Hearn, Sheena Derry, Cathy Stannard, Roger Knaggs, R Andrew Moore

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 71 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 420 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 420 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 66 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 10%
Researcher 41 10%
Student > Bachelor 33 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 6%
Other 70 17%
Unknown 142 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 96 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 53 13%
Psychology 47 11%
Social Sciences 18 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 3%
Other 35 8%
Unknown 159 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2021.
All research outputs
#795,826
of 26,374,136 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,402
of 13,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,624
of 341,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#33
of 258 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,374,136 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,311 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 258 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.