↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Routine perineal shaving on admission in labour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
12 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
Title
Routine perineal shaving on admission in labour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001236.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vittorio Basevi, Tina Lavender

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 186 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 11%
Student > Postgraduate 17 9%
Researcher 15 8%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Other 34 18%
Unknown 67 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 16%
Social Sciences 12 6%
Psychology 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 72 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2022.
All research outputs
#547,903
of 25,922,020 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#924
of 13,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,629
of 271,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 255 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,922,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,165 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 255 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.