↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Neurosurgical interventions for the treatment of classical trigeminal neuralgia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
172 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
311 Mendeley
Title
Neurosurgical interventions for the treatment of classical trigeminal neuralgia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007312.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joanna M Zakrzewska, Harith Akram

Abstract

Surgical interventions are used for trigeminal neuralgia when drug treatment fails. Surgical treatments divide into two main categories, ablative (destructive) or non-ablative. These treatments can be done at three different sites: peripherally, at the Gasserian ganglion level, and within the posterior fossa of the skull.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 311 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 309 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 15%
Student > Bachelor 39 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 11%
Researcher 29 9%
Other 21 7%
Other 56 18%
Unknown 83 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 135 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 4%
Psychology 9 3%
Neuroscience 9 3%
Other 34 11%
Unknown 100 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2020.
All research outputs
#3,815,396
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,323
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,417
of 136,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#45
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.