↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

H1‐antihistamines for chronic spontaneous urticaria

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
17 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
290 Mendeley
Title
H1‐antihistamines for chronic spontaneous urticaria
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006137.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maulina Sharma, Cathy Bennett<sup>a</sup>, Stuart N Cohen<sup>a</sup>, Ben Carter

Abstract

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is characterised by the development of crops of red, itchy, raised weals or hives with no identifiable external cause.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 290 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 288 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 15%
Student > Bachelor 35 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 11%
Other 18 6%
Researcher 18 6%
Other 52 18%
Unknown 91 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 107 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 8%
Psychology 14 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 3%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Other 29 10%
Unknown 100 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,699,214
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,654
of 13,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,001
of 270,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#84
of 256 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 256 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.