| Title |
Music therapy for depression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004517.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sonja Aalbers, Laura Fusar‐Poli, Ruth E Freeman, Marinus Spreen, Johannes CF Ket, Annemiek C Vink, Anna Maratos, Mike Crawford, Xi‐Jing Chen, Christian Gold |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 341 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 56 | 16% |
| Spain | 39 | 11% |
| United States | 25 | 7% |
| Canada | 11 | 3% |
| Mexico | 9 | 3% |
| Japan | 8 | 2% |
| Australia | 6 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 4 | 1% |
| France | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 38 | 11% |
| Unknown | 141 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 258 | 76% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 45 | 13% |
| Scientists | 29 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1155 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 191 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 132 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 78 | 7% |
| Researcher | 67 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 44 | 4% |
| Other | 195 | 17% |
| Unknown | 448 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 149 | 13% |
| Psychology | 132 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 131 | 11% |
| Arts and Humanities | 51 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 36 | 3% |
| Other | 167 | 14% |
| Unknown | 489 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 709. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2024.
All research outputs
#29,552
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#58
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#520
of 319,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.