The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Reminder systems to improve patient adherence to tuberculosis clinic appointments for diagnosis and treatment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006594.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Qin Liu, Katharine Abba, Marissa M Alejandria, David Sinclair, Vincent M Balanag, Mary Ann D Lansang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 504 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Romania | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 494 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 91 | 18% |
| Researcher | 74 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 44 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 28 | 6% |
| Other | 91 | 18% |
| Unknown | 135 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 136 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 76 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 23 | 5% |
| Psychology | 18 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 14 | 3% |
| Other | 72 | 14% |
| Unknown | 165 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,103,576
of 26,367,306 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,075
of 13,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,565
of 373,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#42
of 257 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,367,306 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 257 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.