↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Reminder systems to improve patient adherence to tuberculosis clinic appointments for diagnosis and treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
376 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Reminder systems to improve patient adherence to tuberculosis clinic appointments for diagnosis and treatment
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006594.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qin Liu, Katharine Abba, Marissa M Alejandria, David Sinclair, Vincent M Balanag, Mary Ann D Lansang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 376 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 366 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 80 21%
Researcher 64 17%
Student > Bachelor 36 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 10%
Student > Postgraduate 28 7%
Other 69 18%
Unknown 63 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 121 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 59 16%
Social Sciences 19 5%
Psychology 16 4%
Computer Science 10 3%
Other 62 16%
Unknown 89 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2017.
All research outputs
#395,262
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,217
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,044
of 286,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 230 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 230 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.