↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Reminder systems to improve patient adherence to tuberculosis clinic appointments for diagnosis and treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
494 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Reminder systems to improve patient adherence to tuberculosis clinic appointments for diagnosis and treatment
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006594.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qin Liu, Katharine Abba, Marissa M Alejandria, David Sinclair, Vincent M Balanag, Mary Ann D Lansang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 494 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Unknown 484 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 89 18%
Researcher 73 15%
Student > Bachelor 44 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 8%
Student > Postgraduate 28 6%
Other 86 17%
Unknown 133 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 136 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 74 15%
Social Sciences 22 4%
Psychology 18 4%
Computer Science 14 3%
Other 67 14%
Unknown 163 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2021.
All research outputs
#991,049
of 26,005,389 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,854
of 13,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,241
of 372,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#41
of 257 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,005,389 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,177 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,983 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 257 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.