↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Factors that influence the provision of intrapartum and postnatal care by skilled birth attendants in low‐ and middle‐income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
81 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
179 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
929 Mendeley
Title
Factors that influence the provision of intrapartum and postnatal care by skilled birth attendants in low‐ and middle‐income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011558.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan Munabi‐Babigumira, Claire Glenton, Simon Lewin, Atle Fretheim, Harriet Nabudere

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 81 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 929 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 929 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 170 18%
Researcher 100 11%
Student > Bachelor 82 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 8%
Other 47 5%
Other 164 18%
Unknown 295 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 195 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 192 21%
Social Sciences 52 6%
Psychology 36 4%
Engineering 16 2%
Other 113 12%
Unknown 325 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2022.
All research outputs
#841,790
of 26,243,859 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,509
of 13,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,021
of 444,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,243,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,194 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.