| Title |
Interventions aimed at communities to inform and/or educate about early childhood vaccination
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010232.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ingvil Saeterdal, Simon Lewin, Astrid Austvoll-Dahlgren, Claire Glenton, Susan Munabi-Babigumira |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 24% |
| Australia | 5 | 17% |
| Canada | 4 | 14% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 69% |
| Scientists | 4 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 589 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 579 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 94 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 75 | 13% |
| Researcher | 74 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 38 | 6% |
| Other | 110 | 19% |
| Unknown | 142 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 172 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 66 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 46 | 8% |
| Psychology | 29 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 25 | 4% |
| Other | 85 | 14% |
| Unknown | 166 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,045,115
of 23,509,982 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,312
of 12,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,563
of 366,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#52
of 273 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,509,982 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 273 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.