The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Tonsillectomy or adenotonsillectomy versus non‐surgical treatment for chronic/recurrent acute tonsillitis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001802.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin J Burton, Paul P Glasziou, Lee Yee Chong, Roderick P Venekamp |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 10% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 72% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 21% |
| Scientists | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 297 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 294 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 54 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 40 | 13% |
| Researcher | 24 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 7% |
| Other | 55 | 19% |
| Unknown | 83 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 132 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 7% |
| Psychology | 14 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 30 | 10% |
| Unknown | 90 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 107. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2023.
All research outputs
#414,997
of 26,240,084 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#687
of 13,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,616
of 373,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 255 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,240,084 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,194 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 255 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.