| Title |
Smart home technologies for health and social care support
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006412.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Suzanne Martin, Greg Kelly, W George Kernohan, Bernadette McCreight, Christopher Nugent |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 476 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Bangladesh | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | <1% |
| Unknown | 451 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 75 | 16% |
| Researcher | 72 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 64 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 56 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 5% |
| Other | 92 | 19% |
| Unknown | 93 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 99 | 21% |
| Computer Science | 58 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 48 | 10% |
| Psychology | 38 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 8% |
| Other | 88 | 18% |
| Unknown | 109 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2021.
All research outputs
#3,609,973
of 24,914,266 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,350
of 13,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,410
of 98,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,914,266 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,007 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.