The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Tranexamic acid for upper gastrointestinal bleeding
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006640.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cathy Bennett, Sarah Louise Klingenberg, Ebbe Langholz, Lise Lotte Gluud |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Chile | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 16 | 76% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 62% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 29% |
| Scientists | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 234 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 26 | 11% |
| Researcher | 23 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 8% |
| Other | 51 | 21% |
| Unknown | 75 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 106 | 45% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 4% |
| Psychology | 5 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 5% |
| Unknown | 83 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2021.
All research outputs
#983,194
of 26,316,305 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,804
of 13,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,934
of 372,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#41
of 259 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,316,305 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,209 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 259 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.