↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Tranexamic acid for upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
6 blogs
twitter
22 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Tranexamic acid for upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006640.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cathy Bennett, Sarah Louise Klingenberg, Ebbe Langholz, Lise Lotte Gluud

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 166 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 12%
Student > Bachelor 20 12%
Student > Master 19 11%
Other 19 11%
Student > Postgraduate 15 9%
Other 45 26%
Unknown 31 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 91 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 5%
Computer Science 4 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 37 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2020.
All research outputs
#513,446
of 17,587,008 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,203
of 11,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,088
of 315,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#32
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,587,008 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,150 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.