↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Tranexamic acid for upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
6 blogs
twitter
21 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Tranexamic acid for upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006640.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cathy Bennett, Sarah Louise Klingenberg, Ebbe Langholz, Lise Lotte Gluud

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 187 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 24 13%
Student > Bachelor 22 12%
Researcher 21 11%
Student > Master 19 10%
Student > Postgraduate 16 8%
Other 48 25%
Unknown 41 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 98 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 5%
Psychology 4 2%
Computer Science 4 2%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 48 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2021.
All research outputs
#651,747
of 21,435,803 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,383
of 12,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,835
of 346,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,435,803 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.