↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Acupuncture-point stimulation for chemotherapy-induced nausea or vomiting

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
Acupuncture-point stimulation for chemotherapy-induced nausea or vomiting
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002285.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeanette Ezzo, Mary Ann Richardson, Andrew Vickers, Claire Allen, Suzanne Dibble, Brian F Issell, Lixing Lao, Michael Pearl, Gilbert Ramirez, Joseph A Roscoe, Joannie Shen, Jane C Shivnan, Konrad Streitberger, Imad Treish, Grant Zhang, Eric Manheimer

Abstract

There have been recent advances in chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting using 5-HT3 inhibitors and dexamethasone. However, many still experience these symptoms, and expert panels encourage additional methods to reduce these symptoms.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 80 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 18%
Student > Master 9 11%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Other 4 5%
Other 17 21%
Unknown 22 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 26 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2018.
All research outputs
#827,979
of 22,771,140 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,756
of 12,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,714
of 361,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#42
of 274 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,771,140 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 274 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.