↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for cough in cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Interventions for cough in cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007881.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Molassiotis A, Bailey C, Caress A, Brunton L, Smith J, Molassiotis, Alex, Bailey, Chris, Caress, Ann, Brunton, Lisa, Smith, Jacky

Abstract

Cough is a common symptom in patients with malignancies, especially in patients with lung cancer. Cough is not well controlled in clinical practice and clinicians have few management options to treat it.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 43 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 20%
Student > Master 6 13%
Professor 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Other 5 11%
Other 13 29%
Unknown 2 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 56%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 5 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2015.
All research outputs
#1,286,486
of 12,100,779 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,286
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,179
of 273,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#71
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,100,779 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.