The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Interventions for cough in cancer
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2010
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007881.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Molassiotis, Alex, Bailey, Chris, Caress, Ann, Brunton, Lisa, Smith, Jacky |
Abstract |
Cough is a common symptom in patients with malignancies, especially in patients with lung cancer. Cough is not well controlled in clinical practice and clinicians have few management options to treat it. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
Colombia | 1 | 11% |
Jersey | 1 | 11% |
Spain | 1 | 11% |
Netherlands | 1 | 11% |
Japan | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Portugal | 1 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 48 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 12% |
Other | 5 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
Professor | 5 | 10% |
Other | 15 | 30% |
Unknown | 4 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 54% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 10% |
Unknown | 7 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2023.
All research outputs
#3,774,725
of 23,578,918 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,367
of 12,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,946
of 96,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,918 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.