| Title |
Interventions for the management of taste disturbances
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010470.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sumanth Kumbargere Nagraj, Shetty Naresh, Kandula Srinivas, P Renjith George, Ashish Shrestha, David Levenson, Debra M Ferraiolo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 28% |
| Spain | 4 | 14% |
| Canada | 2 | 7% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 62% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 24% |
| Scientists | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 176 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 37 | 21% |
| Unknown | 44 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 10% |
| Psychology | 11 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 11% |
| Unknown | 52 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,085,482
of 22,771,140 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,453
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,762
of 361,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#60
of 276 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,771,140 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 276 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.