↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Tissue adhesives for closure of surgical incisions

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
42 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
12 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
381 Mendeley
Title
Tissue adhesives for closure of surgical incisions
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004287.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jo C Dumville, Paul Coulthard, Helen V Worthington, Philip Riley, Neil Patel, James Darcey, Marco Esposito, Maarten van der Elst, Oscar J F van Waes

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 381 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 377 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 56 15%
Student > Bachelor 40 10%
Researcher 38 10%
Other 36 9%
Student > Postgraduate 30 8%
Other 75 20%
Unknown 106 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 146 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 6%
Engineering 17 4%
Psychology 14 4%
Materials Science 9 2%
Other 50 13%
Unknown 124 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 371. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2023.
All research outputs
#86,044
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#157
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#801
of 375,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 262 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 262 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.