↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Strategies for expanding health insurance coverage in vulnerable populations

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
348 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Strategies for expanding health insurance coverage in vulnerable populations
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008194.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liying Jia, Beibei Yuan, Fei Huang, Ying Lu, Paul Garner, Qingyue Meng

Abstract

Health insurance has the potential to improve access to health care and protect people from the financial risks of diseases. However, health insurance coverage is often low, particularly for people most in need of protection, including children and other vulnerable populations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 348 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 341 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 62 18%
Researcher 41 12%
Student > Bachelor 31 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 8%
Student > Postgraduate 19 5%
Other 72 21%
Unknown 96 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 86 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 47 14%
Social Sciences 30 9%
Psychology 14 4%
Unspecified 13 4%
Other 51 15%
Unknown 107 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2016.
All research outputs
#7,993,771
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,729
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,946
of 370,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#205
of 262 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 262 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.