↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Back schools for non-specific low-back pain.

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
133 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
Title
Back schools for non-specific low-back pain.
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000261.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martijn W Heymans, Maurits W van Tulder, Rosmin Esmail, Claire Bombardier, Bart W Koes

Abstract

Since the introduction of the Swedish back school in 1969, back schools have frequently been used for treating patients with low-back pain (LBP). However, the content of back schools has changed and appears to vary widely today.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 173 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 23%
Student > Bachelor 27 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 13%
Student > Postgraduate 16 9%
Researcher 15 9%
Other 31 18%
Unknown 23 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 73 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 17%
Psychology 15 9%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Sports and Recreations 4 2%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 29 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2014.
All research outputs
#3,517,289
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,769
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,301
of 287,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#165
of 216 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,687 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 216 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.