↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Back schools for non-specific low-back pain.

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
137 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
205 Mendeley
Title
Back schools for non-specific low-back pain.
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000261.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martijn W Heymans, Maurits W van Tulder, Rosmin Esmail, Claire Bombardier, Bart W Koes

Abstract

Since the introduction of the Swedish back school in 1969, back schools have frequently been used for treating patients with low-back pain (LBP). However, the content of back schools has changed and appears to vary widely today.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 202 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 20%
Student > Bachelor 33 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 11%
Researcher 20 10%
Student > Postgraduate 15 7%
Other 36 18%
Unknown 37 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 80 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 15%
Psychology 17 8%
Sports and Recreations 7 3%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 42 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2014.
All research outputs
#7,204,796
of 22,772,779 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,776
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,625
of 62,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,772,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.