| Title |
Surgical interventions for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006990.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rishi Sharma, Raj Lakhani, Joanne Rimmer, Claire Hopkins |
| Abstract |
Surgical treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps is an established treatment for medically resistant nasal polyp disease. Whether a nasal polypectomy with additional sinus dissection offers any advantage over an isolated nasal polypectomy has not been systematically reviewed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ukraine | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 126 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
| Researcher | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 24 | 19% |
| Unknown | 41 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 48 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2019.
All research outputs
#6,409,658
of 22,772,779 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,218
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,481
of 362,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#197
of 270 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,772,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 270 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.