The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
The Epley (canalith repositioning) manoeuvre for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003162.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Malcolm P Hilton, Darren K Pinder |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 10 | 15% |
Brazil | 2 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
Mexico | 2 | 3% |
Ecuador | 2 | 3% |
United States | 2 | 3% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Ireland | 1 | 2% |
Korea, Republic of | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 5% |
Unknown | 39 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 58 | 89% |
Scientists | 4 | 6% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 540 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 535 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 83 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 74 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 46 | 9% |
Researcher | 38 | 7% |
Other | 34 | 6% |
Other | 106 | 20% |
Unknown | 159 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 210 | 39% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 63 | 12% |
Neuroscience | 21 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 11 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 2% |
Other | 52 | 10% |
Unknown | 173 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 106. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2024.
All research outputs
#418,646
of 26,370,291 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#686
of 13,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,678
of 372,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 263 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,370,291 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 263 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.