↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Calcium channel blockers for neuroleptic‐induced tardive dyskinesia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
Calcium channel blockers for neuroleptic‐induced tardive dyskinesia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000206.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adib Essali, Hany Deirawan, Karla Soares‐Weiser, Clive E Adams

Abstract

Schizophrenia and related disorders affect a sizable proportion of any population. Neuroleptic (antipsychotic) medications are the primary treatment for these disorders. Neuroleptic medications are associated with a variety of side effects including tardive dyskinesia. Dyskinesia is a disfiguring movement disorder of the orofacial region that can be tardive (having a slow or belated onset). Tardive dyskinesia is difficult to treat, despite experimentation with several treatments. Calcium channel blockers (diltiazem, nifedipine, nimodipine, verapamil) have been among these experimental treatments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 68 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 17%
Researcher 11 16%
Other 10 14%
Student > Master 9 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Other 14 20%
Unknown 7 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 35%
Psychology 10 14%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Neuroscience 4 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 14 20%
Unknown 9 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2017.
All research outputs
#6,333,477
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,626
of 11,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,684
of 155,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#95
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.