↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Mirror therapy, graded motor imagery and virtual illusion for the management of chronic pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Mirror therapy, graded motor imagery and virtual illusion for the management of chronic pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2016
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010329.pub2
Authors

Lee Plumbe, Susan Peters, Sally Bennett, Bill Vicenzino, Michel W Coppieters

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 55 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 11 20%
Student > Bachelor 9 16%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 6 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 19 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 21%
Neuroscience 7 13%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Psychology 3 5%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 7 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2021.
All research outputs
#6,177,322
of 19,003,560 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,401
of 11,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,723
of 427,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#169
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,003,560 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,915 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.9. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.