The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Timing of intravenous prophylactic antibiotics for preventing postpartum infectious morbidity in women undergoing cesarean delivery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009516.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. Dhanya Mackeen, Roger E Packard, Erika Ota, Vincenzo Berghella, Jason K Baxter |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 20% |
| Spain | 3 | 15% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 10% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 70% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 418 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 410 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 60 | 14% |
| Researcher | 51 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 29 | 7% |
| Other | 25 | 6% |
| Other | 84 | 20% |
| Unknown | 132 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 172 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 34 | 8% |
| Unknown | 146 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,184,434
of 26,544,284 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,248
of 13,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,414
of 370,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#45
of 254 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,544,284 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,265 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 254 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.