The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Peripheral nerve blocks for postoperative pain after major knee surgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010937.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jin Xu, Xue‐mei Chen, Chen‐kai Ma, Xiang‐rui Wang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 186 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 18% |
| Other | 24 | 13% |
| Researcher | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 9% |
| Other | 49 | 26% |
| Unknown | 25 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 108 | 57% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 8% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 10% |
| Unknown | 32 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2015.
All research outputs
#3,166,334
of 26,266,588 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,753
of 13,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,219
of 371,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#131
of 268 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,266,588 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,202 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 268 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.