↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Psychological therapies versus antidepressant medication, alone and in combination for depression in children and adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
8 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
123 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
781 Mendeley
Title
Psychological therapies versus antidepressant medication, alone and in combination for depression in children and adolescents
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008324.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Georgina R Cox, Patch Callahan, Rachel Churchill, Vivien Hunot, Sally N Merry, Alexandra G Parker, Sarah E Hetrick

Abstract

Depressive disorders are common in children and adolescents and, if left untreated, are likely to recur in adulthood. Depression is highly debilitating, affecting psychosocial, family and academic functioning.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 781 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 777 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 124 16%
Student > Bachelor 113 14%
Researcher 92 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 65 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 52 7%
Other 129 17%
Unknown 206 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 165 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 163 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 59 8%
Social Sciences 38 5%
Neuroscience 21 3%
Other 101 13%
Unknown 234 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,269,647
of 26,372,509 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,487
of 13,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,942
of 373,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#51
of 260 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,372,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,216 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 260 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.