↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Cardiac rehabilitation for people with heart disease: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
69 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
155 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
265 Mendeley
Title
Cardiac rehabilitation for people with heart disease: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011273.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lindsey Anderson, Rod S Taylor

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 260 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 19%
Student > Bachelor 45 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 14%
Researcher 24 9%
Student > Postgraduate 18 7%
Other 44 17%
Unknown 46 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 50 19%
Psychology 12 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 4%
Sports and Recreations 11 4%
Other 35 13%
Unknown 61 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2020.
All research outputs
#495,695
of 17,504,055 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,158
of 11,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,793
of 313,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#29
of 252 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,504,055 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,705 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 252 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.