Nocturnal mechanical ventilation for chronic hypoventilation in patients with neuromuscular and chest wall disorders
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Djillali Annane, David Orlikowski, Sylvie Chevret
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||11||85%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||2||15%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 307 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||40||13%|
|Student > Bachelor||32||10%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||22||7%|
|Student > Postgraduate||15||5%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||115||37%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||29||9%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2020.
All research outputs
of 24,520,935 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 12,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 364,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 280 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,520,935 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 280 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.