↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Nocturnal mechanical ventilation for chronic hypoventilation in patients with neuromuscular and chest wall disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
362 Mendeley
Title
Nocturnal mechanical ventilation for chronic hypoventilation in patients with neuromuscular and chest wall disorders
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001941.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Djillali Annane, David Orlikowski, Sylvie Chevret

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 362 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Unknown 360 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 51 14%
Researcher 41 11%
Student > Master 41 11%
Student > Bachelor 32 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 6%
Other 73 20%
Unknown 102 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 116 32%
Unspecified 51 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 8%
Psychology 12 3%
Social Sciences 11 3%
Other 29 8%
Unknown 113 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2020.
All research outputs
#3,257,026
of 25,382,250 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,026
of 12,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,084
of 365,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#135
of 272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,250 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,981 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.