↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Nocturnal mechanical ventilation for chronic hypoventilation in patients with neuromuscular and chest wall disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
241 Mendeley
Title
Nocturnal mechanical ventilation for chronic hypoventilation in patients with neuromuscular and chest wall disorders
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001941.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Djillali Annane, David Orlikowski, Sylvie Chevret

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 241 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Unknown 239 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 41 17%
Student > Master 36 15%
Student > Bachelor 24 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 8%
Student > Postgraduate 14 6%
Other 51 21%
Unknown 55 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 106 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 10%
Social Sciences 11 5%
Psychology 7 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Other 22 9%
Unknown 66 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2020.
All research outputs
#2,533,657
of 19,097,846 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,248
of 11,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,023
of 328,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#133
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,097,846 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,928 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.