↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

What is this page? Embed badge

Nocturnal mechanical ventilation for chronic hypoventilation in patients with neuromuscular and chest wall disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
113 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
297 Mendeley
Summary Twitter Facebook Dimensions citations
Title
Nocturnal mechanical ventilation for chronic hypoventilation in patients with neuromuscular and chest wall disorders
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001941.pub3
Pubmed ID
25503955
Authors

Djillali Annane, David Orlikowski, Sylvie Chevret

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 297 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Unknown 295 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 39 13%
Student > Master 39 13%
Student > Bachelor 32 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 7%
Student > Postgraduate 15 5%
Other 69 23%
Unknown 82 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 112 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 10%
Unspecified 13 4%
Social Sciences 11 4%
Psychology 10 3%
Other 29 10%
Unknown 93 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2020.
All research outputs
#2,791,648
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,469
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,966
of 354,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#130
of 278 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,732 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 278 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.

This page is hosted by Altmetric on behalf of Cochrane Library.