↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Negative pressure wound therapy for partial-thickness burns

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
Title
Negative pressure wound therapy for partial-thickness burns
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006215.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jo C Dumville, Christopher Munson, Janice Christie

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 137 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 18%
Researcher 17 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Student > Postgraduate 8 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 5%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 47 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 51 37%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2021.
All research outputs
#3,952,775
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,406
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,960
of 354,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#150
of 278 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 278 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.