↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Negative pressure wound therapy for partial-thickness burns

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
Title
Negative pressure wound therapy for partial-thickness burns
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006215.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jo C Dumville, Christopher Munson, Janice Christie

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 105 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 20%
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 26 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 29 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2020.
All research outputs
#2,564,703
of 16,682,934 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,226
of 11,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,360
of 272,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#139
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,682,934 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,568 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,491 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.