| Title |
Rapid diagnostic tests for diagnosing uncomplicated non-falciparum orPlasmodium vivaxmalaria in endemic countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011431 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katharine Abba, Amanda J Kirkham, Piero L Olliaro, Jonathan J Deeks, Sarah Donegan, Paul Garner, Yemisi Takwoingi |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 395 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 2 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Burkina Faso | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 388 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 74 | 19% |
| Researcher | 52 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 26 | 7% |
| Other | 77 | 19% |
| Unknown | 87 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 105 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 27 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 70 | 18% |
| Unknown | 104 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2021.
All research outputs
#3,262,357
of 23,700,294 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,043
of 12,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,677
of 357,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#140
of 282 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,700,294 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,753 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 282 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.