↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Conservative versus interventional management for primary spontaneous pneumothorax in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
Title
Conservative versus interventional management for primary spontaneous pneumothorax in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010565.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Ashby, Greg Haug, Pete Mulcahy, Kathryn J Ogden, Oliver Jensen, Julia AE Walters

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Greece 1 <1%
Unknown 131 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 14%
Student > Bachelor 17 13%
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 27 20%
Unknown 36 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 9%
Psychology 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 42 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2021.
All research outputs
#3,111,774
of 25,388,353 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,861
of 12,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,694
of 360,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#127
of 250 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,353 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 250 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.