↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Oxcarbazepine for neuropathic pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
14 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
275 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Oxcarbazepine for neuropathic pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007963.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Muke Zhou, Ning Chen, Li He, Mi Yang, Cairong Zhu, Fengbo Wu

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 275 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 275 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 17%
Student > Bachelor 23 8%
Researcher 20 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 7%
Other 15 5%
Other 46 17%
Unknown 105 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 84 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 5%
Psychology 8 3%
Neuroscience 7 3%
Other 30 11%
Unknown 115 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,650,116
of 26,522,299 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,341
of 13,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,000
of 451,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#68
of 233 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,522,299 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 233 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.