↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Different types of intermittent pneumatic compression devices for preventing venous thromboembolism in patients after total hip replacement

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
193 Mendeley
Title
Different types of intermittent pneumatic compression devices for preventing venous thromboembolism in patients after total hip replacement
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009543.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jin Min Zhao, Mao Lin He, Zeng Ming Xiao, Ting Song Li, Hao Wu, Hua Jiang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 193 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 15%
Student > Bachelor 27 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 11%
Other 19 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Other 40 21%
Unknown 42 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 84 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 7%
Sports and Recreations 8 4%
Engineering 8 4%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 19 10%
Unknown 54 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,544,549
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,546
of 12,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,667
of 353,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#92
of 284 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,332 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 284 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.