↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Different types of intermittent pneumatic compression devices for preventing venous thromboembolism in patients after total hip replacement

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
Title
Different types of intermittent pneumatic compression devices for preventing venous thromboembolism in patients after total hip replacement
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009543.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jin Min Zhao, Mao Lin He, Zeng Ming Xiao, Ting Song Li, Hao Wu, Hua Jiang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 212 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 14%
Student > Bachelor 29 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 10%
Other 20 9%
Researcher 16 8%
Other 44 21%
Unknown 52 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 89 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 8%
Sports and Recreations 8 4%
Engineering 8 4%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 20 9%
Unknown 65 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,843,866
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,941
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,423
of 360,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#92
of 272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.