↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Prophylactic manual rotation for fetal malposition to reduce operative delivery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
229 Mendeley
Title
Prophylactic manual rotation for fetal malposition to reduce operative delivery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009298.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hala Phipps, Bradley de Vries, Jon Hyett, David A Osborn

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 229 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 228 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 12%
Student > Bachelor 26 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 8%
Researcher 17 7%
Other 13 6%
Other 47 21%
Unknown 80 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 15%
Social Sciences 10 4%
Psychology 9 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Other 17 7%
Unknown 89 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2016.
All research outputs
#6,410,128
of 22,775,504 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,218
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,762
of 353,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#201
of 284 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,775,504 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 284 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.