↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Incision and drainage of perianal abscess with or without treatment of anal fistula

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Incision and drainage of perianal abscess with or without treatment of anal fistula
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006827.pub2
Authors

Ali Irqam Malik, Richard L Nelson, Samson Tou

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
India 1 1%
Singapore 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 78 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 17%
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 19 23%
Unknown 12 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 57%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 17 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2014.
All research outputs
#3,014,524
of 12,101,174 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,420
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,683
of 274,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#145
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,101,174 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.