↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Cordyceps sinensis (a traditional Chinese medicine) for treating chronic kidney disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
7 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Cordyceps sinensis (a traditional Chinese medicine) for treating chronic kidney disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008353.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hong Wei Zhang, Zhi Xiu Lin, Yuk Stewart Tung, Tze Hoi Kwan, Chun Keung Mok, Connie Leung, Lai Sum Chan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 186 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 15%
Student > Bachelor 28 15%
Researcher 22 12%
Other 15 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 6%
Other 29 15%
Unknown 54 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 65 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2024.
All research outputs
#549,775
of 26,094,193 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#919
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,397
of 364,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 268 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,094,193 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 268 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.