↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Use of electronic health records to support smoking cessation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
Title
Use of electronic health records to support smoking cessation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008743.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raymond Boyle, Leif Solberg, Michael Fiore

Abstract

Health information systems such as electronic health records (EHR), computerized decision support systems, and electronic prescribing are potentially valuable components to improve the quality and efficiency of clinical interventions for tobacco use.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 197 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 16%
Researcher 27 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 11%
Other 15 8%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Other 41 21%
Unknown 47 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 12%
Psychology 11 6%
Computer Science 9 5%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 58 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2020.
All research outputs
#3,577,415
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,116
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,686
of 359,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#133
of 274 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 274 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.