| Title |
Interventions for fatigue in peripheral neuropathy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008146.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claire M White, Pieter A van Doorn, Marcel PJ Garssen, Rachel C Stockley |
| Abstract |
Persistent feelings of fatigue (or subjective fatigue), which may be experienced in the absence of physiological factors, affect many people with peripheral neuropathy. A variety of interventions for subjective fatigue are available, but little is known about their efficacy or the likelihood of any adverse effects for people with peripheral neuropathy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 374 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 373 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 65 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 45 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 10% |
| Researcher | 25 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 79 | 21% |
| Unknown | 101 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 87 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 68 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 21 | 6% |
| Psychology | 19 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 48 | 13% |
| Unknown | 119 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2021.
All research outputs
#3,122,038
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,750
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,144
of 360,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#126
of 241 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 241 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.