↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for fatigue in peripheral neuropathy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
266 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for fatigue in peripheral neuropathy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008146.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claire M White, Pieter A van Doorn, Marcel PJ Garssen, Rachel C Stockley

Abstract

Persistent feelings of fatigue (or subjective fatigue), which may be experienced in the absence of physiological factors, affect many people with peripheral neuropathy. A variety of interventions for subjective fatigue are available, but little is known about their efficacy or the likelihood of any adverse effects for people with peripheral neuropathy.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 265 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 58 22%
Student > Bachelor 37 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 10%
Researcher 19 7%
Other 18 7%
Other 53 20%
Unknown 54 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 81 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 55 21%
Psychology 11 4%
Sports and Recreations 9 3%
Neuroscience 8 3%
Other 32 12%
Unknown 70 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2021.
All research outputs
#2,840,958
of 17,517,444 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,478
of 11,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,397
of 312,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#140
of 247 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,517,444 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,709 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,227 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 247 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.