↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Vestibular rehabilitation for unilateral peripheral vestibular dysfunction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
11 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
396 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
816 Mendeley
Title
Vestibular rehabilitation for unilateral peripheral vestibular dysfunction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005397.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle N McDonnell, Susan L Hillier

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 816 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 811 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 138 17%
Student > Bachelor 101 12%
Researcher 63 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 7%
Unspecified 48 6%
Other 177 22%
Unknown 231 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 216 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 118 14%
Unspecified 48 6%
Neuroscience 38 5%
Psychology 22 3%
Other 102 13%
Unknown 272 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,133,797
of 26,673,263 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,111
of 13,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,113
of 365,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#41
of 281 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,673,263 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,269 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 281 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.