↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Peritoneal closure versus no peritoneal closure for patients undergoing non‐obstetric abdominal operations

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
Title
Peritoneal closure versus no peritoneal closure for patients undergoing non‐obstetric abdominal operations
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010424.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Etienne Cassar Delia, Brian R Davidson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 150 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 13%
Researcher 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Student > Postgraduate 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 29 19%
Unknown 47 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 8%
Psychology 11 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 1%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 53 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2023.
All research outputs
#7,993,771
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,729
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,106
of 206,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#219
of 303 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,681 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 303 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.