↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Peritoneal closure versus no peritoneal closure for patients undergoing non‐obstetric abdominal operations

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
Title
Peritoneal closure versus no peritoneal closure for patients undergoing non‐obstetric abdominal operations
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010424.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Etienne Cassar Delia, Brian R Davidson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 142 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 13%
Researcher 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Student > Postgraduate 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 29 20%
Unknown 40 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Psychology 11 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 1%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 46 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2023.
All research outputs
#7,942,119
of 25,387,189 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,223
of 12,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,121
of 203,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#220
of 310 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,850 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.2. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 310 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.