↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Haloperidol versus first‐generation antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
21 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
332 Mendeley
Title
Haloperidol versus first‐generation antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009831.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Markus Dold, Myrto T Samara, Chunbo Li, Magdolna Tardy, Stefan Leucht

Abstract

Haloperidol is worldwide one of the most frequently used antipsychotic drugs with a very high market share. Previous narrative, unsystematic reviews found no differences in terms of efficacy between the various first-generation ("conventional", "typical") antipsychotic agents. This established the unproven psychopharmacological assumption of a comparable efficacy between the first-generation antipsychotic compounds codified in textbooks and treatment guidelines. Because this assumption contrasts with the clinical impression, a high-quality systematic review appeared highly necessary.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 332 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 329 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 16%
Student > Bachelor 47 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 8%
Researcher 24 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 7%
Other 55 17%
Unknown 105 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 21%
Psychology 31 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 4%
Other 57 17%
Unknown 120 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,612,905
of 25,391,066 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,482
of 12,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,473
of 358,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#75
of 252 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,391,066 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 252 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.