↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

House dust mite reduction and avoidance measures for treating eczema

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
38 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
262 Mendeley
Title
House dust mite reduction and avoidance measures for treating eczema
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008426.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helen Nankervis, Emma V Pynn, Robert J Boyle, Lesley Rushton, Hywel C Williams, Deanne M Hewson, Thomas Platts‐Mills

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 262 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 14%
Researcher 26 10%
Student > Bachelor 22 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 7%
Unspecified 15 6%
Other 49 19%
Unknown 94 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 72 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 8%
Unspecified 16 6%
Psychology 15 6%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Other 31 12%
Unknown 99 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,193,603
of 25,932,719 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,346
of 13,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,623
of 362,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#52
of 282 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,932,719 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,164 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,571 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 282 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.