The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
House dust mite reduction and avoidance measures for treating eczema
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008426.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Helen Nankervis, Emma V Pynn, Robert J Boyle, Lesley Rushton, Hywel C Williams, Deanne M Hewson, Thomas Platts‐Mills |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 12% |
| France | 2 | 6% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 6% |
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 18 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 59% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 32% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 267 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 39 | 15% |
| Researcher | 26 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 43 | 16% |
| Unknown | 104 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 73 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 9% |
| Psychology | 15 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 32 | 12% |
| Unknown | 110 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,311,182
of 26,385,174 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,578
of 13,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,004
of 364,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#55
of 282 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,385,174 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 282 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.