↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

House dust mite reduction and avoidance measures for treating eczema

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
40 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
Title
House dust mite reduction and avoidance measures for treating eczema
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008426.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helen Nankervis, Emma V Pynn, Robert J Boyle, Lesley Rushton, Hywel C Williams, Deanne M Hewson, Thomas Platts-Mills

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 209 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 15%
Researcher 24 11%
Student > Bachelor 20 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 9%
Student > Postgraduate 11 5%
Other 33 16%
Unknown 72 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 10%
Psychology 14 7%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 76 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2021.
All research outputs
#918,251
of 22,085,721 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,049
of 12,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,628
of 325,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#49
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,085,721 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,179 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.