↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Complementary therapies for acne vulgaris

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
532 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Complementary therapies for acne vulgaris
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009436.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Huijuan Cao, Guoyan Yang, Yuyi Wang, Jian Ping Liu, Caroline A Smith, Hui Luo, Yueming Liu

Abstract

Acne is a chronic skin disease characterised by inflamed spots and blackheads on the face, neck, back, and chest. Cysts and scarring can also occur, especially in more severe disease. People with acne often turn to complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), such as herbal medicine, acupuncture, and dietary modifications, because of their concerns about the adverse effects of conventional medicines. However, evidence for CAM therapies has not been systematically assessed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 532 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 527 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 80 15%
Student > Master 75 14%
Researcher 46 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 7%
Student > Postgraduate 28 5%
Other 96 18%
Unknown 168 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 187 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 49 9%
Psychology 19 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 3%
Social Sciences 14 3%
Other 67 13%
Unknown 181 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 87. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2024.
All research outputs
#497,922
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#873
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,112
of 363,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 283 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 283 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.