↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Corticosteroids for myasthenia gravis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Corticosteroids for myasthenia gravis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002828.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christiane Schneider-Gold, Philippe Gajdos, Klaus V Toyka, Reinhard R Hohlfeld

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 118 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 17%
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Other 14 12%
Student > Postgraduate 11 9%
Other 26 21%
Unknown 18 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Neuroscience 6 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 5%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 17 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2017.
All research outputs
#10,023,986
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,150
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#274,064
of 381,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#115
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,476 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.