↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) and aspirin for preventing colorectal adenomas and carcinomas

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
Title
Non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) and aspirin for preventing colorectal adenomas and carcinomas
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004079.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tracey K. Asano, Robin S McLeod

Abstract

There is evidence from experimental animals studies, prospective and retrospective observational studies that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) may reduce the development of sporadic colorectal adenomas (CRAs) and cancer (CRC) and may induce the regression of adenomas in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Turkey 1 1%
Unknown 86 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 22%
Student > Bachelor 15 17%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Other 5 6%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 21 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 27 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2017.
All research outputs
#4,999,064
of 18,033,078 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,347
of 11,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,889
of 298,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#180
of 251 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,033,078 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 251 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.