| Title |
Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001843.pub5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Coral A Anderson, Muhammad Imran Omar, Susan E Campbell, Kathleen F Hunter, June D Cody, Cathryn MA Glazener |
| Abstract |
Urinary incontinence is common after radical prostatectomy and can also occur in some circumstances after transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Conservative management includes pelvic floor muscle training with or without biofeedback, electrical stimulation, extra-corporeal magnetic innervation (ExMI), compression devices (penile clamps), lifestyle changes, or a combination of methods. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
| Colombia | 1 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 627 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 619 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 88 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 75 | 12% |
| Researcher | 56 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 52 | 8% |
| Other | 41 | 7% |
| Other | 134 | 21% |
| Unknown | 181 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 186 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 103 | 16% |
| Psychology | 23 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 16 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 2% |
| Other | 88 | 14% |
| Unknown | 196 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,625,372
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,230
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,258
of 362,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#112
of 287 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 287 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.