↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
13 tweeters
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
456 Mendeley
Title
Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001843.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Coral A Anderson, Muhammad Imran Omar, Susan E Campbell, Kathleen F Hunter, June D Cody, Cathryn MA Glazener

Abstract

Urinary incontinence is common after radical prostatectomy and can also occur in some circumstances after transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Conservative management includes pelvic floor muscle training with or without biofeedback, electrical stimulation, extra-corporeal magnetic innervation (ExMI), compression devices (penile clamps), lifestyle changes, or a combination of methods.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 456 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 448 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 77 17%
Student > Bachelor 58 13%
Researcher 45 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 10%
Student > Postgraduate 36 8%
Other 101 22%
Unknown 95 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 164 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 75 16%
Psychology 19 4%
Sports and Recreations 12 3%
Social Sciences 12 3%
Other 62 14%
Unknown 112 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,891,229
of 17,944,974 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,472
of 11,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,991
of 298,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#112
of 252 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,944,974 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,788 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 252 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.