| Title |
Zonisamide for neuropathic pain in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011241.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
R Andrew Moore, Philip J Wiffen, Sheena Derry, Michael PT Lunn |
| Abstract |
Antiepileptic drugs have been used in pain management since the 1960s; some have shown efficacy in treating different neuropathic pain conditions. The efficacy of zonisamide for the relief of neuropathic pain has not previously been reviewed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 29% |
| Spain | 2 | 14% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 93% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 155 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 13% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 7% |
| Researcher | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 15% |
| Unknown | 52 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Psychology | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 11% |
| Unknown | 56 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2019.
All research outputs
#3,154,641
of 25,026,088 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,921
of 13,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,363
of 363,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#128
of 287 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,026,088 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,013 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 287 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.