↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Cell salvage in emergency trauma surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
Title
Cell salvage in emergency trauma surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007379.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiang Li, Shao Liang Sun, Jin Hui Tian, KeHu Yang, Ruifeng Liu, Jun Li

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 115 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Researcher 11 10%
Other 10 9%
Other 22 19%
Unknown 25 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 16%
Psychology 4 3%
Engineering 3 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 30 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2020.
All research outputs
#3,206,662
of 18,816,598 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,798
of 11,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,584
of 304,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#139
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,816,598 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.