↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Cell salvage in emergency trauma surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
Title
Cell salvage in emergency trauma surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007379.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiang Li, Shao Liang Sun, Jin Hui Tian, KeHu Yang, Ruifeng Liu, Jun Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 156 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 14%
Researcher 14 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Other 13 8%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Other 30 19%
Unknown 50 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 12%
Unspecified 6 4%
Psychology 4 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 2%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 55 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2020.
All research outputs
#6,512,770
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,114
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,566
of 361,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#168
of 282 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 282 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.