↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Prosthetic rehabilitation for older dysvascular people following a unilateral transfemoral amputation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
Title
Prosthetic rehabilitation for older dysvascular people following a unilateral transfemoral amputation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005260.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jane Cumming, Steve Barr, Tracey E Howe

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 136 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 27%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 24 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 18%
Engineering 13 9%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Psychology 6 4%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 30 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2015.
All research outputs
#14,146,535
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,362
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,878
of 352,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#237
of 284 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 284 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.