↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Diazepam for treating tetanus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
Title
Diazepam for treating tetanus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003954.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christy AN Okoromah, Afolabi FE Lesi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 209 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 12%
Researcher 24 11%
Student > Bachelor 23 11%
Student > Postgraduate 19 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 7%
Other 41 19%
Unknown 65 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 36%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 4%
Psychology 6 3%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 75 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2020.
All research outputs
#7,451,284
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,941
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,854
of 133,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.