↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

18F‐FDG PET for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease dementia and other dementias in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
146 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
403 Mendeley
Title
<sup>18</sup>F‐FDG PET for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease dementia and other dementias in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010632.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nadja Smailagic<sup>a</sup>, Marco Vacante, Chris Hyde, Steven Martin, Obioha Ukoumunne, Christos Sachpekidis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 403 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 401 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 13%
Researcher 46 11%
Student > Bachelor 41 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 8%
Other 27 7%
Other 70 17%
Unknown 133 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 84 21%
Psychology 29 7%
Neuroscience 28 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 3%
Other 68 17%
Unknown 154 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2024.
All research outputs
#7,465,669
of 26,109,760 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,845
of 13,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,937
of 364,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#190
of 281 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,109,760 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,185 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.4. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 281 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.