↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

18 F-FDG PET for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease dementia and other dementias in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
305 Mendeley
Title
18 F-FDG PET for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease dementia and other dementias in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010632.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nadja Smailagic, Marco Vacante, Chris Hyde, Steven Martin, Obioha Ukoumunne, Christos Sachpekidis

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 305 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 303 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 14%
Researcher 37 12%
Student > Bachelor 37 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 11%
Other 22 7%
Other 65 21%
Unknown 68 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 25%
Psychology 31 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 9%
Neuroscience 20 7%
Social Sciences 12 4%
Other 54 18%
Unknown 87 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2019.
All research outputs
#4,097,065
of 15,340,060 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,737
of 11,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,080
of 287,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#168
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,340,060 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.1. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.