↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

18 F-FDG PET for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease dementia and other dementias in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
127 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
357 Mendeley
Title
18 F-FDG PET for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease dementia and other dementias in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010632.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nadja Smailagic, Marco Vacante, Chris Hyde, Steven Martin, Obioha Ukoumunne, Christos Sachpekidis

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 357 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 355 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 14%
Researcher 42 12%
Student > Bachelor 39 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 9%
Other 24 7%
Other 77 22%
Unknown 92 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 22%
Psychology 30 8%
Neuroscience 28 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 7%
Unspecified 13 4%
Other 70 20%
Unknown 111 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2020.
All research outputs
#6,277,725
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,085
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,692
of 352,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#189
of 281 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 281 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.