↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Artesunate versus quinine for treating severe malaria

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
143 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
316 Mendeley
Title
Artesunate versus quinine for treating severe malaria
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005967.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Sinclair, Sarah Donegan, Rachel Isba, David G Lalloo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 316 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 307 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 16%
Student > Bachelor 44 14%
Researcher 41 13%
Student > Postgraduate 28 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 7%
Other 57 18%
Unknown 71 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 128 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 17 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 4%
Other 37 12%
Unknown 90 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,791,897
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,826
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,426
of 181,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#39
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.